Iroquois Middle School
48301 Romeo Plank Rd
Macomb MI, 48044, Macomb County
Phone: 586-723-3700
Ranking: (414 out of 2,213, top 19%)*
Type: Regular Middle School
Status: Currently Operational
Grade: Grade 6 to Grade 8
School District: Chippewa Valley Schools
Title I Eligible School: No
Magnet: NA
Charter: NA
Shared-Time School: NA
Students and Teachers
2013-2014 | 2012-2013 | 2011-2012 | 2010-2011 | 2009-2010 | 2008-2009 | 2007-2008 | ||||||||
Amount | % | Amount | % | Amount | % | Amount | % | Amount | % | Amount | % | Amount | % | |
Total Teachers: | 53 | 49 | 48 | 46 | 49 | 42 | 43 | |||||||
Total Students: | 1,120 | 1,103 | 1,072 | 1,027 | 1,005 | 955 | 959 | |||||||
Grade 6: | 357 | 31.9% | 377 | 34.2% | 374 | 34.9% | 337 | 32.8% | 349 | 34.7% | 318 | 33.3% | 317 | 33.1% |
Grade 7: | 380 | 33.9% | 381 | 34.5% | 336 | 31.3% | 349 | 34.0% | 328 | 32.6% | 324 | 33.9% | 317 | 33.1% |
Grade 8: | 383 | 34.2% | 345 | 31.3% | 362 | 33.8% | 341 | 33.2% | 328 | 32.6% | 313 | 32.8% | 325 | 33.9% |
Ungraded: | 0 | 0.0% | 0 | 0.0% | 0 | 0.0% | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA |
Student By Gender: | ||||||||||||||
Male: | 583 | 52.1% | 593 | 53.8% | 567 | 52.9% | 534 | 52.0% | 521 | 51.8% | 486 | 50.9% | 488 | 50.9% |
Female: | 537 | 47.9% | 510 | 46.2% | 505 | 47.1% | 493 | 48.0% | 467 | 46.5% | 453 | 47.4% | 465 | 48.5% |
Student By Races: | ||||||||||||||
American Indian/Alaska Native: | 7 | 0.6% | 7 | 0.6% | 5 | 0.5% | 4 | 0.4% | 2 | 0.2% | 2 | 0.2% | 0 | 0.0% |
Asian: | 43 | 3.8% | 34 | 3.1% | 33 | 3.1% | 31 | 3.0% | 24 | 2.4% | 18 | 1.9% | 19 | 2.0% |
Hispanic: | 46 | 4.1% | 42 | 3.8% | 30 | 2.8% | 23 | 2.2% | 14 | 1.4% | 10 | 1.0% | 13 | 1.4% |
Black: | 38 | 3.4% | 45 | 4.1% | 42 | 3.9% | 42 | 4.1% | 32 | 3.2% | 25 | 2.6% | 32 | 3.3% |
White: | 963 | 86.0% | 950 | 86.1% | 933 | 87.0% | 910 | 88.6% | 924 | 91.9% | 892 | 93.4% | 893 | 93.1% |
Hawaiian Native/Pacific Islander: | 1 | 0.1% | 1 | 0.1% | 1 | 0.1% | 0 | 0.0% | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA |
Two or More Races: | 22 | 2.0% | 24 | 2.2% | 28 | 2.6% | 17 | 1.7% | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA |
Lunch Program: | ||||||||||||||
Free Lunch Program Eligible: | 183 | 16.3% | 219 | 19.9% | 205 | 19.1% | 188 | 18.3% | 137 | 13.6% | 76 | 8.0% | 75 | 7.8% |
Reduced-Price Lunch Program Eligible: | 40 | 3.6% | 36 | 3.3% | 35 | 3.3% | 30 | 2.9% | 34 | 3.4% | 25 | 2.6% | 29 | 3.0% |
Student-Teacher Ratio: | 21.25 | 22.46 | 22.38 | 22.52 | 20.47 | 22.60 | 22.30 |
Test Performance
Year | Test | Grade | Measurement | Score | School District | State Average |
MEAP | ||||||
2006 | Math | 6th Grade | % met std | 75.5% | 76.1% | 65.1% |
2007 | Math | 6th Grade | % met std | 79.7% | 78.5% | 69% |
2008 | Math | 6th Grade | % met std | 80.6% | 80% | 72.7% |
2009 | Math | 6th Grade | % met std | 86.1% | 85.8% | 79.9% |
2010 | Math | 6th Grade | % met std | 91.9% | 88.9% | 82% |
2011 | Math | 6th Grade | % met std | 88.4% | 89.5% | 84.5% |
2012 | Math | 6th Grade | % met std | 41% | 38.5% | 37.1% |
2013 | Math | 6th Grade | % met std | 49% | 44.2% | 40.2% |
2006 | Reading | 6th Grade | % met std | 89.8% | 88.5% | 79.6% |
2007 | Reading | 6th Grade | % met std | 91% | 88.9% | 83.3% |
2008 | Reading | 6th Grade | % met std | 92.7% | 88.9% | 81.8% |
2009 | Reading | 6th Grade | % met std | 89.6% | 86.9% | 80.5% |
2010 | Reading | 6th Grade | % met std | 94.2% | 94.9% | 87.7% |
2011 | Reading | 6th Grade | % met std | 87.8% | 89% | 84% |
2012 | Reading | 6th Grade | % met std | 78.4% | 75.6% | 67% |
2013 | Reading | 6th Grade | % met std | 75.1% | 75.6% | 68.2% |
2010 | Social Studies | 6th Grade | % met std | 88.2% | 84.4% | 73.4% |
2011 | Social Studies | 6th Grade | % met std | 82.2% | 81.9% | 75.3% |
2012 | Social Studies | 6th Grade | % met std | 30.8% | 30.4% | 27.7% |
2013 | Social Studies | 6th Grade | % met std | 34% | 34.3% | 29.7% |
2006 | Writing | 6th Grade | % met std | 78.9% | 79.8% | 74.8% |
2007 | Writing | 6th Grade | % met std | 79.7% | 75.4% | 74.1% |
2008 | Writing | 6th Grade | % met std | 83.9% | 79.1% | 72.7% |
2009 | Writing | 6th Grade | % met std | 82% | 81.2% | 75.7% |
2006 | Math | 7th Grade | % met std | 73% | 70.6% | 59.6% |
2007 | Math | 7th Grade | % met std | 70.1% | 72.7% | 64.3% |
2008 | Math | 7th Grade | % met std | 84.4% | 79.1% | 72.7% |
2009 | Math | 7th Grade | % met std | 91% | 87.2% | 82.6% |
2010 | Math | 7th Grade | % met std | 92.6% | 88.3% | 82.2% |
2011 | Math | 7th Grade | % met std | 92.6% | 89.1% | 84.6% |
2012 | Math | 7th Grade | % met std | 44.7% | 42.1% | 37.2% |
2013 | Math | 7th Grade | % met std | 53% | 44.1% | 38.4% |
2006 | Reading | 7th Grade | % met std | 88.7% | 85.5% | 75.8% |
2007 | Reading | 7th Grade | % met std | 92.2% | 87% | 79.7% |
2008 | Reading | 7th Grade | % met std | 83% | 79.5% | 72.5% |
2009 | Reading | 7th Grade | % met std | 90.4% | 86.1% | 79.6% |
2010 | Reading | 7th Grade | % met std | 89.5% | 89.1% | 82% |
2011 | Reading | 7th Grade | % met std | 86.5% | 84.9% | 79% |
2012 | Reading | 7th Grade | % met std | 61.3% | 65.4% | 59.7% |
2013 | Reading | 7th Grade | % met std | 74.4% | 70.8% | 62% |
2006 | Writing | 7th Grade | % met std | 80.6% | 76.4% | 66.7% |
2007 | Writing | 7th Grade | % met std | 81.1% | 79.1% | 65.4% |
2008 | Writing | 7th Grade | % met std | 84.9% | 80% | 76.6% |
2009 | Writing | 7th Grade | % met std | 87.4% | 84.9% | 77.9% |
2011 | Writing | 7th Grade | % met std | 59% | 54.8% | 47.8% |
2012 | Writing | 7th Grade | % met std | 52.8% | 55.3% | 47.3% |
2013 | Writing | 7th Grade | % met std | 53.6% | 62.2% | 51.7% |
2006 | Math | 8th Grade | % met std | 78.9% | 75.6% | 63.2% |
2007 | Math | 8th Grade | % met std | 79.5% | 79.3% | 68.1% |
2008 | Math | 8th Grade | % met std | 84.4% | 82% | 71.6% |
2009 | Math | 8th Grade | % met std | 86.3% | 81.4% | 74.5% |
2010 | Math | 8th Grade | % met std | 87.2% | 80.6% | 70.3% |
2011 | Math | 8th Grade | % met std | 85.3% | 84.7% | 78% |
2012 | Math | 8th Grade | % met std | 32% | 33.7% | 29.4% |
2013 | Math | 8th Grade | % met std | 38.5% | 34.3% | 32.5% |
2006 | Reading | 8th Grade | % met std | 85% | 76.2% | 72.9% |
2007 | Reading | 8th Grade | % met std | 90.4% | 86.7% | 75.6% |
2008 | Reading | 8th Grade | % met std | 91% | 86.8% | 77.1% |
2009 | Reading | 8th Grade | % met std | 83.2% | 82.7% | 75.5% |
2010 | Reading | 8th Grade | % met std | 93.1% | 89.8% | 83.4% |
2011 | Reading | 8th Grade | % met std | 87.5% | 87.6% | 81.9% |
2012 | Reading | 8th Grade | % met std | 69.4% | 68.7% | 60.5% |
2013 | Reading | 8th Grade | % met std | 76.1% | 73% | 65.7% |
2006 | Science | 8th Grade | % met std | 82.8% | 82% | 76.8% |
2007 | Science | 8th Grade | % met std | 84.5% | 83.5% | 74.9% |
2008 | Science | 8th Grade | % met std | 86.6% | 85.9% | 79.2% |
2009 | Science | 8th Grade | % met std | 87.9% | 83.2% | 76.3% |
2010 | Science | 8th Grade | % met std | 86.4% | 81.7% | 75.9% |
2011 | Science | 8th Grade | % met std | 84% | 82.5% | 78.1% |
2012 | Science | 8th Grade | % met std | 13.2% | 12.5% | 16.5% |
2013 | Science | 8th Grade | % met std | 12.5% | 11.3% | 15.9% |
2006 | Writing | 8th Grade | % met std | 66.4% | 65.8% | 64.7% |
2007 | Writing | 8th Grade | % met std | 84.1% | 79.7% | 66.8% |
2008 | Writing | 8th Grade | % met std | 82.9% | 80.2% | 69.8% |
2009 | Writing | 8th Grade | % met std | 81.9% | 79.3% | 74.2% |
Some data by SchoolDigger.com.
* Iroquois Middle School was rated 4.5 out of 5 by USA.com. The ranking was calculated based on publically available historical Math and English performance data.